Pinochet's fallout: jurisdiction and immunity for criminal violations of international law
Identifieur interne : 006A57 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 006A56; suivant : 006A58Pinochet's fallout: jurisdiction and immunity for criminal violations of international law
Auteurs : David TurnsSource :
- Legal Studies [ 0261-3875 ] ; 2000-11.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- geographic : Chili.
- topic : Extradition, Compétence extraterritoriale, Internet, Contrôle juridictionnel, Expertise médicale, Infraction, Groupe religieux, Terrorisme, Torture.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Amnesty, British authorities, British nationals, Chile, Chilean, Conduct date, Criminal jurisdiction, Criminal justice, Criminal violations, Criminality, Crown prosecution service, Derechos, Derechos report, Divisional, Divisional court, Double criminality, Double criminality rule, Extradition, Extradition crimes, Extradition proceedings, Extraterritorial, Extraterritorial jurisdiction, Federal republic, Former head, Genocide, Genocide convention, Goff, Home secretary, Icty, Immunity, International community, International crimes, International tribunal, International tribunals, Internet, Judge garzon, Judicial review, Legal studies, Lord goff, Lord hope, Lord hutton, Lord lloyd, Lord millett, Lord nicholls, Lord phillips, Lord slynn, Lord steyn, Lords decision, Lords decisions, Medical report, Medical treatment, Millett, Municipal courts, National courts, October, Offence, Passive personality principle, Personal immunity, Pinochet, Pinochet case, Religious group, Rights abuses, Senator pinochet, Spanish courts, Spanish nationals, State doctrine, State immunity, Such crimes, Terrorism, Terrorist, Terrorist offences, Third house, Third state, Torture, Torture convention, Universal jurisdiction, Vienna convention.
- Teeft :
- Amnesty, British authorities, British nationals, Chile, Chilean, Conduct date, Criminal jurisdiction, Criminal justice, Criminal violations, Criminality, Crown prosecution service, Derechos, Derechos report, Divisional, Divisional court, Double criminality, Double criminality rule, Extradition, Extradition crimes, Extradition proceedings, Extraterritorial, Extraterritorial jurisdiction, Federal republic, Former head, Genocide, Genocide convention, Goff, Home secretary, Icty, Immunity, International community, International crimes, International tribunal, International tribunals, Internet, Judge garzon, Judicial review, Legal studies, Lord goff, Lord hope, Lord hutton, Lord lloyd, Lord millett, Lord nicholls, Lord phillips, Lord slynn, Lord steyn, Lords decision, Lords decisions, Medical report, Medical treatment, Millett, Municipal courts, National courts, October, Offence, Passive personality principle, Personal immunity, Pinochet, Pinochet case, Religious group, Rights abuses, Senator pinochet, Spanish courts, Spanish nationals, State doctrine, State immunity, Such crimes, Terrorism, Terrorist, Terrorist offences, Third house, Third state, Torture, Torture convention, Universal jurisdiction, Vienna convention.
Abstract
This article provides a general overview, and analysis of the litigation surrounding General Augusto Pinochet's detention in London in 1998 and the subsequent attempts to extradite him to Spain, for trial on charges relating to human rights abuses committed during the period of his militaty dictatorship in Chile between 1973 and 1990. The complicated sequence of events, from proceedings in the Spanish courts (which started in 1996) up to Pinochet's release from British custody on medical grounds in 2000, is examined und the potential consequences of the two substantive House of Lords decisions are explored from a British‐based public international lawyer's perspective. The focus of the analysis is not so much on the detailed technicalities of personal immunity in English law: as on the broad concepts of State jurisdiction over international crimes and immunity for such crimes in international criminal law: notable aspects discussed include the future of universal jurisdiction in customary international law and the position of that law in the UK's municipal courts.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2000.tb00160.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :006A57
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D6D557FED3C7CD3F430921DF2356F4B328EB68FDCuration
No country items
David Turns<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lecturer, International & European Law Unit, School of Law, University of Liverpool</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Liverpool</wicri:noCountry></affiliation>Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Pinochet's fallout: jurisdiction and immunity for criminal violations of international law</title><author><name sortKey="Turns, David" sort="Turns, David" uniqKey="Turns D" first="David" last="Turns">David Turns</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lecturer, International & European Law Unit, School of Law, University of Liverpool</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Liverpool</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D6D557FED3C7CD3F430921DF2356F4B328EB68FD</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1748-121X.2000.tb00160.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D6D557FED3C7CD3F430921DF2356F4B328EB68FD/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006A57</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006A57</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006A57</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Pinochet's fallout: jurisdiction and immunity for criminal violations of international law<ref type="note" target="#fn1">*</ref></title><author><name sortKey="Turns, David" sort="Turns, David" uniqKey="Turns D" first="David" last="Turns">David Turns</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lecturer, International & European Law Unit, School of Law, University of Liverpool</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Liverpool</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Legal Studies</title><title level="j" type="alt">LEGAL STUDIES</title><idno type="ISSN">0261-3875</idno><idno type="eISSN">1748-121X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="566">566</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="591">591</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">26</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-11">2000-11</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0261-3875</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0261-3875</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Amnesty</term><term>British authorities</term><term>British nationals</term><term>Chile</term><term>Chilean</term><term>Conduct date</term><term>Criminal jurisdiction</term><term>Criminal justice</term><term>Criminal violations</term><term>Criminality</term><term>Crown prosecution service</term><term>Derechos</term><term>Derechos report</term><term>Divisional</term><term>Divisional court</term><term>Double criminality</term><term>Double criminality rule</term><term>Extradition</term><term>Extradition crimes</term><term>Extradition proceedings</term><term>Extraterritorial</term><term>Extraterritorial jurisdiction</term><term>Federal republic</term><term>Former head</term><term>Genocide</term><term>Genocide convention</term><term>Goff</term><term>Home secretary</term><term>Icty</term><term>Immunity</term><term>International community</term><term>International crimes</term><term>International tribunal</term><term>International tribunals</term><term>Internet</term><term>Judge garzon</term><term>Judicial review</term><term>Legal studies</term><term>Lord goff</term><term>Lord hope</term><term>Lord hutton</term><term>Lord lloyd</term><term>Lord millett</term><term>Lord nicholls</term><term>Lord phillips</term><term>Lord slynn</term><term>Lord steyn</term><term>Lords decision</term><term>Lords decisions</term><term>Medical report</term><term>Medical treatment</term><term>Millett</term><term>Municipal courts</term><term>National courts</term><term>October</term><term>Offence</term><term>Passive personality principle</term><term>Personal immunity</term><term>Pinochet</term><term>Pinochet case</term><term>Religious group</term><term>Rights abuses</term><term>Senator pinochet</term><term>Spanish courts</term><term>Spanish nationals</term><term>State doctrine</term><term>State immunity</term><term>Such crimes</term><term>Terrorism</term><term>Terrorist</term><term>Terrorist offences</term><term>Third house</term><term>Third state</term><term>Torture</term><term>Torture convention</term><term>Universal jurisdiction</term><term>Vienna convention</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Amnesty</term><term>British authorities</term><term>British nationals</term><term>Chile</term><term>Chilean</term><term>Conduct date</term><term>Criminal jurisdiction</term><term>Criminal justice</term><term>Criminal violations</term><term>Criminality</term><term>Crown prosecution service</term><term>Derechos</term><term>Derechos report</term><term>Divisional</term><term>Divisional court</term><term>Double criminality</term><term>Double criminality rule</term><term>Extradition</term><term>Extradition crimes</term><term>Extradition proceedings</term><term>Extraterritorial</term><term>Extraterritorial jurisdiction</term><term>Federal republic</term><term>Former head</term><term>Genocide</term><term>Genocide convention</term><term>Goff</term><term>Home secretary</term><term>Icty</term><term>Immunity</term><term>International community</term><term>International crimes</term><term>International tribunal</term><term>International tribunals</term><term>Internet</term><term>Judge garzon</term><term>Judicial review</term><term>Legal studies</term><term>Lord goff</term><term>Lord hope</term><term>Lord hutton</term><term>Lord lloyd</term><term>Lord millett</term><term>Lord nicholls</term><term>Lord phillips</term><term>Lord slynn</term><term>Lord steyn</term><term>Lords decision</term><term>Lords decisions</term><term>Medical report</term><term>Medical treatment</term><term>Millett</term><term>Municipal courts</term><term>National courts</term><term>October</term><term>Offence</term><term>Passive personality principle</term><term>Personal immunity</term><term>Pinochet</term><term>Pinochet case</term><term>Religious group</term><term>Rights abuses</term><term>Senator pinochet</term><term>Spanish courts</term><term>Spanish nationals</term><term>State doctrine</term><term>State immunity</term><term>Such crimes</term><term>Terrorism</term><term>Terrorist</term><term>Terrorist offences</term><term>Third house</term><term>Third state</term><term>Torture</term><term>Torture convention</term><term>Universal jurisdiction</term><term>Vienna convention</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Chili</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Extradition</term><term>Compétence extraterritoriale</term><term>Internet</term><term>Contrôle juridictionnel</term><term>Expertise médicale</term><term>Infraction</term><term>Groupe religieux</term><term>Terrorisme</term><term>Torture</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article provides a general overview, and analysis of the litigation surrounding General Augusto Pinochet's detention in London in 1998 and the subsequent attempts to extradite him to Spain, for trial on charges relating to human rights abuses committed during the period of his militaty dictatorship in Chile between 1973 and 1990. The complicated sequence of events, from proceedings in the Spanish courts (which started in 1996) up to Pinochet's release from British custody on medical grounds in 2000, is examined und the potential consequences of the two substantive House of Lords decisions are explored from a British‐based public international lawyer's perspective. The focus of the analysis is not so much on the detailed technicalities of personal immunity in English law: as on the broad concepts of State jurisdiction over international crimes and immunity for such crimes in international criminal law: notable aspects discussed include the future of universal jurisdiction in customary international law and the position of that law in the UK's municipal courts.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006A57 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 006A57 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D6D557FED3C7CD3F430921DF2356F4B328EB68FD
|texte= Pinochet's fallout: jurisdiction and immunity for criminal violations of international law
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |